<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Pentaho Community Forums - Metadata</title>
		<link>http://forums.pentaho.com/</link>
		<description>Pentaho Metadata Editor, MQL, Publishing...</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:24:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Creating relationship on a non-star schema model</title>
			<link>http://forums.pentaho.com/showthread.php?144312-Creating-relationship-on-a-non-star-schema-model&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:26:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi, 
 
Question : Can Pentaho Meta editor support a non-star schema model? 
 
Scenario: 
 
We are trying to evaluate pentaho to embed as a BI tool...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi,<br />
<br />
Question : Can Pentaho Meta editor support a non-star schema model?<br />
<br />
Scenario:<br />
<br />
We are trying to evaluate pentaho to embed as a BI tool for our DW product. Our datawarehouse is not a typical star scheme model in which dimensions are directly linked to facts;but we have group-bridge tables between dimenion and facts<br />
<br />
A typical join between DIM_PRODUCT&amp; FACT_CASE looks like:<br />
      <b>DIM_PRODUCT</b>.PRODUCT_ID = PRODUCT_BRIDGE.PRODUCT_ID and<br />
      PRODUCT_BRIDGE.PRODUCT_GROUP_ID = PRODUCT_GROUP.PRODUCT_GROUP_ID<br />
      PRODUCT_GROUP.PRODUCT_GROUP_ID = <b>FACT_CASE</b>.PRODUCT_GROUP_ID<br />
<br />
You can notice above the addtional joins in our model between dimension and facts. I had build this relationship in Pentaho meta editor and then created a business view of DIM_PRODUCT &amp; FACT_CASE table in it. When I tried to pull a adhoc report from these two tables;it says invalid relationship.(Note: I didnt bring the Group &amp; Bridge tables in business view;since user does need to view the intermediate tables)<br />
<br />
Currently we use SAP BO that supports this as we are planning to move to pentaho for cost-effectiveness.Please provide clarity on whether the above is achievable in pentaho.<br />
<br />
Thanks,<br />
Sreedev.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.pentaho.com/forumdisplay.php?103-Metadata">Metadata</category>
			<dc:creator>ssreedev</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.pentaho.com/showthread.php?144312-Creating-relationship-on-a-non-star-schema-model</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Problem using Date mask</title>
			<link>http://forums.pentaho.com/showthread.php?143465-Problem-using-Date-mask&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 09:43:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello, 
 
I'm currently trying to get my data according to a specific format for my date column. 
 
I tried to follow some topics saying that I...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello,<br />
<br />
I'm currently trying to get my data according to a specific format for my date column.<br />
<br />
I tried to follow some topics saying that I should add a new &quot;concept&quot; in the concept editor and then add a property of &quot;Mask for Number or Date&quot; and finally applying it to my column. <br />
<br />
Once done, when I get into the query editor, no changes appear, does anyone already get this issue ?<br />
<br />
Thanks all</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.pentaho.com/forumdisplay.php?103-Metadata">Metadata</category>
			<dc:creator>pentaUser</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.pentaho.com/showthread.php?143465-Problem-using-Date-mask</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
