Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Community Forums
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: [Mondrian] NULL and EMPTY again

  1. #1
    michael bienstein Guest

    Default [Mondrian] NULL and EMPTY again

    First off, given what happened with Richard, I'd say that everything I've said on NULL and EMPTY needs to be thoroughly tested on the MS product. I get the feeling that NULL is never a valid value for scalars according to some comments by Mosha. Yet there is probably some property somewhere for NullHandling.

    > >> Michael wrote:
    > >>
    > >> You can also use NULL explicitly in Range function:
    > >> [Time].[1997].FirstChild : NULL


    >> Michael, I don't think Mondrian supports that. Can you log a bug?



    Yep:
    1671613

    Michael








    ___________________________________________________________________________
    D

  2. #2
    Julian Hyde Guest

    Default RE: [Mondrian] NULL and EMPTY again

    Michael wrote:

    First off, given what happened with Richard, I'd say that everything
    I've said on NULL and EMPTY needs to be thoroughly tested on the MS
    product. I get the feeling that NULL is never a valid value for scalars
    according to some comments by Mosha. Yet there is probably some
    property somewhere for NullHandling.

    I couldn't agree more.

    I repeat: If committers don't have access to an instance of MSAS to test
    behavior against the 'reference implementation' of MDX, I can make it
    available to them.

    Julian

    _______________________________________________
    Mondrian mailing list
    Mondrian (AT) pentaho (DOT) org
    http://lists.pentaho.org/mailman/listinfo/mondrian

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Privacy Policy | Legal Notices | Safe Harbor Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2005 - 2019 Hitachi Vantara Corporation. All Rights Reserved.